Even Republicans Confused By ‘Unfocused’ Trump Impeachment Lawyers

Several Republicans, including some of former President Donald Trump’s most ardent defenders, said they were confused and concerned by his lawyers’ rambling, unfocused opening salvos in Trump’s impeachment trial.

The Senate began hearing arguments on Tuesday over whether a president can be impeached after leaving office. While Democrats spent hours detailing, with explicit video and social media footage, Trump’s effort to support the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, Trump lawyer Bruce Castor offered a strange defense of his client that touched on free speech and the partisan nature of impeachments but rarely the constitutionality of doing so post-administration.

The tactic perplexed some Republicans.

“President Trump’s team was disorganized,” Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who voted with Democrats to uphold the constitutionality of the trial, said after the vote. “If I’m an impartial juror, and one side is doing a great job, and the other side is doing a terrible job on the issue at hand, as an impartial juror, I’m going to vote for the side that did the good job.”

“I was perplexed by the first attorney, who did not seem to make any arguments at all, which was an unusual approach to take,” said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who voted with Democrats.

“I was really stunned at the first attorney who presented for former President Trump,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who also voted with Democrats. “I couldn’t figure out where he was going … spent 45 minutes going somewhere, but I don’t think he helped us better understand where he was coming from on the constitutionality.”

“I don’t think the lawyers did the most effective job,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said, calling Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the Democrats’ lead impeachment manager, “impressive.”

Even Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a stalwart defender of Trump throughout his administration, said he “didn’t really know” where Castor was going. 

Six Republicans and every Democrat voted shortly after the arguments to affirm the constitutionality of Trump’s impeachment trial, although the 56-44 tally bodes poorly for any effort to convict Trump, which will require 67 senators.

“No, I set up the outline a week ago and it will not change,” he said.

David Schoen, another lawyer defending Trump, said on Tuesday that the trial would “tear the country in half,” accusing Democrats of using the process to further divide the nation. 

“As a matter of policy,” he said, “it is wrong, as wrong can be for all of us as a nation.”

Trump himself was reportedly confused and frustrated by the defense. The New York Times reported he was “shocked” that Castor praised Democrats’ case in his early remarks. CNN echoed that reporting:

The trial began Tuesday with a harrowing video compilation of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, emphasizing Trump’s role fanning the flames of the deadly insurrection and his work to spread lies about the results of the 2020 election. Raskin said the then-president’s words amounted to the definition of a high crime and misdemeanor.

“Then there was the sound that I will never forget: the sound of pounding on the door like a battering ram,” Raskin added. “The most haunting sound I ever heard and I will never forget it.”

For more updates check below links and stay updated with News AKMI.
Education News || Politics News || Journal News || Daily Local News || Lifetime Fitness || Sports News || Automotive News


Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button

usa news wall today prime news newso time news post wall